Therapeutic role of nitroglycerin against copper-nitrilotriacetate induced hepatic and renal damage.

Earlier we have shown that exposure to copper-nitrilotriacetate (Cu-NTA) manifests toxicity by generating oxidative stress and potent induction of proliferative reaction in the liver and kidney. In the study, we look at the impact of nitroglycerin (GTN) administration on Cu-NTA-induced oxidative stress and hyperproliferative response in the liver and kidney. GTN administration intraperitoneally to male Wistar rats after Cu-NTA administration intraperitoneally caused substantial protection against Cu-NTA-induced tissue injury, oxidative stress and hyperproliferative response. Cu-NTA administration at a dose of 4.5 mg/kg body weight produces significant (p < .001) elevation in biochemical parameters including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (CREA) with a concomitant increase in microsomal lipid peroxidation. Along with these alterations, we discovered a substantial increment in [3H]thymidine incorporation into hepatic and renal DNA synthesis (p < .001). Cu-NTA-induced tissue damage and lipid peroxidation in hepatic and renal tissues were inhibited by GTN treatment in a dose-dependent manner (p < .05-0.001). Furthermore, GTN can suppress the hyperproliferative response elicited by Cu-NTA by down-regulating the rate of [3H]thymidine incorporation into hepatic and renal DNA (p < .01-0.001). Protective effect of GTN against Cu-NTA was also confirmed by histopathological changes in liver and kidney. This result suggests that GTN may serve as a scavenger for reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduces toxic metabolites of Cu-NTA, thereby avoiding tissue injury and oxidative stress. Further, administration of NO inhibitor, NG-Nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME), exacerbated Cu-NTA induced oxidative tissue damage and cell proliferation. Overall, GTN reduces Cu-NTA-induced tissue damage, oxidative stress, and proliferative response in the rat liver and kidney, according to these findings. On the basis of the above results, present study suggests that GTN may be a potential therapeutic agent for restoration of oxidative damage and proliferation to liver and kidney.

Is Glyceryl Trinitrate, a Nitric Oxide Donor Responsible for Ameliorating the Chemical-Induced Tissue Injury In Vivo?

Oxidative stress induced by well-known toxins including ferric nitrilotriacetate (Fe-NTA), carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and thioacetamide (TAA) has been attributed to causing tissue injury in the liver and kidney. In this study, the effect of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a donor of nitric oxide and NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (l-NAME), a nitric oxide inhibitor on TAA-induced hepatic oxidative stress, GSH and GSH-dependent enzymes, serum transaminases and tumor promotion markers such as ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity and [3H]-thymidine incorporation in rats were examined. The animals were divided into seven groups consisting of six healthy rats per group. The six rats were injected intraperitoneally with TAA to evaluate its toxic effect, improvement in its toxic effect if any, or worsening in its toxic effect if any, when given in combination with GTN or l-NAME. The single necrogenic dose of TAA administration caused a significant change in the levels of both hepatic and serum enzymes such as glutathione S-transferase (GST), glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), alanine aminotransferase (AST) and aspartate aminotransferase (ALT). In addition, treatment with TAA also augmented malondialdehyde (MDA), ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity and [3H]-thymidine incorporation in rats liver. Concomitantly, TAA treatment depleted the levels of GSH. However, most of these changes were alleviated by the treatment of animals with GTN dose-dependently. The protective effect of GTN against TAA was also confirmed histopathologically. The present data confirmed our earlier findings with other oxidants including Fe-NTA and CCl4. The GTN showed no change whatsoever when administered alone, however when it was given along with TAA then it showed protection thereby contributing towards defending the role against oxidants-induced organ toxicity. Overall, GTN may contribute to protection against TAA-induced oxidative stress, toxicity, and proliferative response in the liver, according to our findings.

Explosions, Burn Injuries and Adverse Health Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Review of Current Regulations and Future Perspectives.

PURPOSE: While there is a declining trend in the use of traditional methods of smoking tobacco, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have gained popularity worldwide. ENDS are marketed as safe for the primary reason that they do not contain the well-established toxic ingredients found in traditional cigarettes. However, growing concerns over incidences of fire and explosion with specific types of ENDS, as well as their short and long-term effects, remain unaddressed. This review examines the under studied role of customized components such as batteries, e-liquid compositions, and methods of nicotine delivery that result in physical injuries and adverse health effects of ENDS. METHODS: Using online reference databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Medline other, Google scholar, FDA website, FDA register), we analyzed the mechanisms through which ENDS may pose significant risk to human health. RESULTS: An increase in the use and popularity of ENDS has been observed among youth and adults in the United States since 2007. The ENDS devices available to the public allow for custom alterations which can introduce incompatible components, resulting in overheating and explosion related injuries. Heavy metals have been found to leach from some devices into the e-liquid, and the heating of e-liquid ingredients can produce toxic byproducts. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the current literature demonstrates that ENDS are not a safe alternative to traditional cigarettes due to explosion risks and negative health effects including addiction, adverse respiratory and cardiovascular effects, heavy metal leaching, and toxic byproducts exposure. These risks warrant regulation of ENDS devices and formulations, with urgency underscored by their increasing popularity among youth and adults.